<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CYC: State of the Contemporary Romance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://romanceuniversity.org/2009/06/29/cyc-state-of-the-contemporary-romance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://romanceuniversity.org/2009/06/29/cyc-state-of-the-contemporary-romance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 02:45:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christie Ridgway</title>
		<link>http://romanceuniversity.org/2009/06/29/cyc-state-of-the-contemporary-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Christie Ridgway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanceuniversity.org/?p=800#comment-572</guid>
		<description>Dh is having birthday pie at the moment and Hank seems to be none worse the wear for his shots.

If anyone has follow-on questions, feel free to email me through my website, www.christieridgway.com.  I always enjoy talking about the craft and the business! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dh is having birthday pie at the moment and Hank seems to be none worse the wear for his shots.</p>
<p>If anyone has follow-on questions, feel free to email me through my website, <a href="http://www.christieridgway.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.christieridgway.com</a>.  I always enjoy talking about the craft and the business! <img src='http://romanceuniversity.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KelseyBrowning</title>
		<link>http://romanceuniversity.org/2009/06/29/cyc-state-of-the-contemporary-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>KelseyBrowning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanceuniversity.org/?p=800#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Christie -

Hope your dh had a wonderful birthday and that Hank is doing well! You&#039;ll have to let us know if you post puppy pictures at RWTTD.

Thanks for being here. Fewer comments today, but hopefully lots of readers!

Kelsey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christie -</p>
<p>Hope your dh had a wonderful birthday and that Hank is doing well! You&#8217;ll have to let us know if you post puppy pictures at RWTTD.</p>
<p>Thanks for being here. Fewer comments today, but hopefully lots of readers!</p>
<p>Kelsey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christie Ridgway</title>
		<link>http://romanceuniversity.org/2009/06/29/cyc-state-of-the-contemporary-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Christie Ridgway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanceuniversity.org/?p=800#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Carrie:  Yes, I have to plot the category books and single title differently.  Usually I have a second plot thread (usually another couple) weaving in and out of the main plot in a single title.  The word count gives me that room to explore more.  In a category, the focus is very tight on the hero and heroine.  That&#039;s what I love about category--the intensity of the romance is heightened because of that focus.

My category books these days are Silhouette Special Editions.  While they are the &quot;hearth and home&quot; line, I think you can write many kinds of stories within that bracket.  Mine usually don&#039;t involve children, but the hero or heroine may be dealing with issues of family.  

I&#039;m glad you don&#039;t think contemporaries are dead, either!  Yes, there was a flood of them at one time, but I keep writing my stories and they keep getting published, so I&#039;m happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carrie:  Yes, I have to plot the category books and single title differently.  Usually I have a second plot thread (usually another couple) weaving in and out of the main plot in a single title.  The word count gives me that room to explore more.  In a category, the focus is very tight on the hero and heroine.  That&#8217;s what I love about category&#8211;the intensity of the romance is heightened because of that focus.</p>
<p>My category books these days are Silhouette Special Editions.  While they are the &#8220;hearth and home&#8221; line, I think you can write many kinds of stories within that bracket.  Mine usually don&#8217;t involve children, but the hero or heroine may be dealing with issues of family.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you don&#8217;t think contemporaries are dead, either!  Yes, there was a flood of them at one time, but I keep writing my stories and they keep getting published, so I&#8217;m happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christie Ridgway</title>
		<link>http://romanceuniversity.org/2009/06/29/cyc-state-of-the-contemporary-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Christie Ridgway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanceuniversity.org/?p=800#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Thanks, guys!  Sorry it took me so long to get here today.  The new puppy had to get to the vet.  I had to pick up a car at the shop. And it&#039;s the dh&#039;s birthday, which means I had to grocery shop (we can&#039;t go out to dinner because we can&#039;t leave yellow lab puppy, Hank, home alone), and shop for presents.  Last minute girl this time.  So... Here goes...

Tracey:  I don&#039;t find it difficult to switch between category and single title, but I am aware of the difference as I work.  There are different word choices and level of sensuality between the two.  Also, in single title I feel comfortable having my characters do &quot;edgier&quot; (for want of better word) things.  For example, I have a secondary heroine who sleeps with an old flame and arranges for the secondary hero to catch her doing so (in order to push him away).  I wouldn&#039;t do that in a category romance.  So there are plot point differences as well.

Kelsey:  I don&#039;t ever say I write romantic comedy because people&#039;s views of humor are so subjective.  It&#039;s also why my characters generally don&#039;t laugh at their own jokes (what if the reader doesn&#039;t get it?).  So, I say my books are straight contemporaries (and I do address some meaty conflicts at times), though they are packaged brightly and I&#039;ve had many of the &quot;cartoon&quot; covers that were so popular some time back.  

Adrienne:  I have been agented since my very first sale.  I &quot;got&quot; an agent just a couple of months before I sold my first book to Silhouette.  Though I have a different agent now (and one in between), each represented both my category and single title romances.  It&#039;s more customary in single title to be agented.  I have friends who rep themselves in category (and some in ST, too).  Some houses will only take submissions from agented authors, but not all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, guys!  Sorry it took me so long to get here today.  The new puppy had to get to the vet.  I had to pick up a car at the shop. And it&#8217;s the dh&#8217;s birthday, which means I had to grocery shop (we can&#8217;t go out to dinner because we can&#8217;t leave yellow lab puppy, Hank, home alone), and shop for presents.  Last minute girl this time.  So&#8230; Here goes&#8230;</p>
<p>Tracey:  I don&#8217;t find it difficult to switch between category and single title, but I am aware of the difference as I work.  There are different word choices and level of sensuality between the two.  Also, in single title I feel comfortable having my characters do &#8220;edgier&#8221; (for want of better word) things.  For example, I have a secondary heroine who sleeps with an old flame and arranges for the secondary hero to catch her doing so (in order to push him away).  I wouldn&#8217;t do that in a category romance.  So there are plot point differences as well.</p>
<p>Kelsey:  I don&#8217;t ever say I write romantic comedy because people&#8217;s views of humor are so subjective.  It&#8217;s also why my characters generally don&#8217;t laugh at their own jokes (what if the reader doesn&#8217;t get it?).  So, I say my books are straight contemporaries (and I do address some meaty conflicts at times), though they are packaged brightly and I&#8217;ve had many of the &#8220;cartoon&#8221; covers that were so popular some time back.  </p>
<p>Adrienne:  I have been agented since my very first sale.  I &#8220;got&#8221; an agent just a couple of months before I sold my first book to Silhouette.  Though I have a different agent now (and one in between), each represented both my category and single title romances.  It&#8217;s more customary in single title to be agented.  I have friends who rep themselves in category (and some in ST, too).  Some houses will only take submissions from agented authors, but not all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carrie</title>
		<link>http://romanceuniversity.org/2009/06/29/cyc-state-of-the-contemporary-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanceuniversity.org/?p=800#comment-568</guid>
		<description>Hi Christie!! Thanks for posting today, great article!!

My question is this - do you have to plan a book differently to be a category rather than a single title? Is there a difference really from a plotting point of view, or is it just simply more pages? sorry if that&#039;s a stupid question! Also, what lines do you target in Harlequin/Silhouette for a contemporary? 

As for me, I refused to read a contemporary until a few years ago....and now I&#039;m hooked! I agree, it may have been because of a glut of them all came out at the same time, and maybe people &quot;overdosed&quot; on them, but I certainly don&#039;t think it&#039;s dead...imho. =)

thanks for your article...very informative!

carrie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Christie!! Thanks for posting today, great article!!</p>
<p>My question is this &#8211; do you have to plan a book differently to be a category rather than a single title? Is there a difference really from a plotting point of view, or is it just simply more pages? sorry if that&#8217;s a stupid question! Also, what lines do you target in Harlequin/Silhouette for a contemporary? </p>
<p>As for me, I refused to read a contemporary until a few years ago&#8230;.and now I&#8217;m hooked! I agree, it may have been because of a glut of them all came out at the same time, and maybe people &#8220;overdosed&#8221; on them, but I certainly don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s dead&#8230;imho. =)</p>
<p>thanks for your article&#8230;very informative!</p>
<p>carrie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrienne Giordano</title>
		<link>http://romanceuniversity.org/2009/06/29/cyc-state-of-the-contemporary-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne Giordano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanceuniversity.org/?p=800#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Hi Christie.  Thank you for being with us today.  I&#039;m curious if you have an agent for your single titles.  If so, did you have an agent before you sold to Harlequin/Silhouette or did the agent come after?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Christie.  Thank you for being with us today.  I&#8217;m curious if you have an agent for your single titles.  If so, did you have an agent before you sold to Harlequin/Silhouette or did the agent come after?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KelseyBrowning</title>
		<link>http://romanceuniversity.org/2009/06/29/cyc-state-of-the-contemporary-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>KelseyBrowning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanceuniversity.org/?p=800#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Christie -

We&#039;re so delighted you&#039;re with us at RU today! Would you label your single title works stright contemporary or romantic comedy? Based on some recent feedback, I&#039;m a little confused about the what editors define as one or the other.

Many thanks!
Kelsey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christie -</p>
<p>We&#8217;re so delighted you&#8217;re with us at RU today! Would you label your single title works stright contemporary or romantic comedy? Based on some recent feedback, I&#8217;m a little confused about the what editors define as one or the other.</p>
<p>Many thanks!<br />
Kelsey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey Devlyn</title>
		<link>http://romanceuniversity.org/2009/06/29/cyc-state-of-the-contemporary-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Devlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanceuniversity.org/?p=800#comment-563</guid>
		<description>Christie,
Thank you for joining us at RU! I enjoyed reading your opinion on category vs. single title. Do you find it difficult to switch between the two when writing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christie,<br />
Thank you for joining us at RU! I enjoyed reading your opinion on category vs. single title. Do you find it difficult to switch between the two when writing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

