Posted On December 30, 2013 by Print This Post

The Myth of the Ladies’ Gun by Adam Firestone

RU’s resident weapons expert ADAM FIRESTONE winds up 2013 with a timely topic. The internet has been full of accounts of parental displeasure over the proliferation of Pepto Bismol pink in girls’ toys, girls’ clothes and girls’ everything else. Admittedly, girls’ guns weren’t the first thing that came to mind when I considered the “pink” issue, but Adam nails it. Our heroines aren’t plastic dolls, so why should their weapons be less than heroic?

Compensating much?

Compensating much?

There’s an oft-repeated saw about the social utility of firearms. It goes something to the effect of “God created men, Sam Colt made them equal” or “Abraham Lincoln freed all men, Sam Colt made them equal.” The central (and very libertarian) ideas behind the sayings are that because of the mass production and distribution of quality firearms at a reasonable price, no person can physically impose his or her will on another because of social, caste or physical superiority. While the axiom is, at its core, true, it has unfortunately been rather sexist in its application. More egregiously, at least from my perspective, it’s resulted in a class of literary heroines who are, because of their gender, weaker and less capable than they ought to be.

I know what you’re thinking. Something to the effect of: “Adam, you’re out of your mind!” Or, for the more charitable among you: “Guns are inanimate objects, they can’t be sexist.” I assure you that I’m quite in possession of my faculties. The rub is less one of technology and more one of promotion. Specifically, I’m talking of that subset of firearms marketed to women as “ladies’ guns.”

Muff Pistol

Muff Pistol

The meaning of “ladies’ gun” has changed little over the centuries. It refers to a small (petite, even!) pistol, firing a diminutive projectile and, generally, on which special attention has been paid to appearance and cosmetics. Such guns have traditionally been marketed to both men and women who want to provide a means of protecting either their significant others or themselves, but with a feminine flair. The marketing is effective; spend some time at any popular shooting range and it won’t be long before you spot a fashionably dressed woman with impeccable makeup and a perfect manicure shooting something dainty and, well, pink.

Pink Glock

Pink Glock

As both a professional in the field of weapon and firearms technology and an instructor who’s been teaching people the fine art of personal defense with a firearm for the better part of twenty years, I’ve got a number of issues with the concept of the ladies’ gun. Note that NONE of these issues have to with the modern ladies’ gun’s “protective coloration” – that is, the fact that they come in pink. A gun’s color is a purely cosmetic issue, not a tactical or a technical one. If someone wants to play Barbie with their carry piece, that’s irrelevant to utility. The factors with which I take issue apply to both practical (i.e., “serious social situations”) and literary applications. A couple of contrasts might be useful to better illustrate the points.

Before I begin, let me state unequivocally that the availability of a firearm – any firearm – is far better than none; this post is about why traditional Ladies’ Guns are a bad choice.

Pink Lady

Pink Lady

Contrast Number 1: Ladies’ Gun Cartridges vs. “Manly” Cartridges

I’m going to let you in on a (very) little secret. Other than in places where it’s prohibited by law or by the property holder, I’m always armed. (Breaking the law with respect to firearms is BAD.) On top of that, I usually carry a primary pistol and a backup. (Kind of like having both a seatbelt *and* an airbag…).

My primary is a semi-automatic pistol chambered for .45 ACP and my backup is usually a small revolver in .357 Magnum. The choice of those two calibers was both deliberate and important: They are the two most effective “standard” rounds available. (By “standard,” I mean cartridges that mere mortals use, not Hand-Cannon, Thunderbolt-of-Zeus cartridges like the .500 Smith & Wesson or the .454 Casull, suitable only for The Hulk and Chuck Norris.) And by effective, I mean “capable of causing a bad guy to stop doing bad things nearly instantly.”

Modern ladies’ guns, on the other hand, are generally chambered for smaller calibers that are considered less difficult to shoot, and that allow for the gun itself to be smaller. A quick Google of “Ladies Gun” will yield numerous offerings in .32 ACP, .380 ACP, .38 Special and 9mm Parabellum. Anybody want to hazard a guess as to why most American police agencies abandoned all but the 9mm Parabellum decades ago? Or why elite military units have returned to the .45 ACP, choosing it over the 9mm Parabellum?

Answer: It isn’t a matter of killing the bad guy, it’s a matter of stopping the bad guy. Handgun cartridges are generally less than effective stoppers. For the most part, they simply do not impart enough energy to the bad guy to get him to cease the objectionable behavior in a timely manner. And by timely manner, I mean “Yes, he’ll bleed out and collapse, but not before he’s stabbed/strangled/bludgeoned you (or your heroine) to death.” Very few handgun cartridges produce near instant incapacitation, and the two that lead the pack are the .45 ACP and the .357 Magnum.

Pink PPK

Pink PPK

Contrast Number 2: Mechanics Matter

Size and operating mechanism differences impact the ease and effectiveness with which a gun can be both carried and shot. Is it easier to haul around a smaller, lighter gun? Sure. However, choosing convenience when it comes to a gun’s weight represents a tradeoff against shooting characteristics, for two reasons.

The first is nothing more than simple physics: The smaller the gun, the lower the mass. The lower the mass, the more readily the gun will be acted upon by motive forces such as recoil. The smaller gun will jump more when fired, requiring more time to bring it back on target for a follow-up shot. Time matters. Think about it – when your heroine is beset by a burly beast of a brute (Hey, writers, did you dig the alliteration?) does she really have time to spare? As an aside, this is particularly important when you arm your heroine with a revolver. Revolvers have no reciprocating components to channel or buffer recoil forces, and thus the sum of the recoil is transmitted to the shooter’s hand.

Pink Taurus

Pink Taurus

The second reason obtains from the nature of the operating systems prevalent in small semi-automatic pistols. Many pistols chambered in typical Ladies’ Gun calibers use a mechanism called “blowback.” In blowback operated guns, there is no delay between the time the gun fires and the time that the breech, or slide, begins moving to the rear. While simple and less expensive to manufacture, the blowback mechanism amplifies perceived recoil, increasing the time between shots. Again, does your heroine really have that kind of time? (As an aside, a new generation of small pistols using a locked breech mechanism is taking hold. These include the Taurus TCP ,the Ruger LCP and the Kel-Tec P3AT.)

As a result of these mechanical differences, the typical Ladies’ Gun is more difficult to shoot and, as a result, requires more training and preparation time to be effectively used.

Conclusion: Sexism and the Myth of the Ladies’ Gun

As can be seen, there are a couple of important corollaries to the axiom about Sam Colt making men equal.

Colonel Colt made all carbon based, bipedal Terran life forms, that is, people, equal, not just men; but only if they are given an equal opportunity, ballistically and mechanically, to defend themselves.

The idea of the “Ladies’ Gun” is sexist. It promotes the myth of feminine helplessness and the idea that women both seek and require tools that trade off effectiveness for putative aesthetics. But then, maybe it’s just me. I like heroines who are strong and capable. Strong and capable heroines deserve the same tools and opportunities as strong and capable heroes.


Any questions for Adam? Any topics you’d like him to address in future posts? Let us know!

Regular contributor DAMON SUEDE kicks off the New Year at RU.


Bio: Adam Firestone brings more than 25 years of experience with weapon systems including small arms, artillery, armor, area denial systems and precision guided munitions to Romance University. Additionally, Adam is an accomplished small arms instructor, editor, literary consultant and co-author of a recently published work on the production of rifles in the United States for Allied forces during the First World War.

Adam has been providing general and technical editing services to authors and publishing houses specializing in firearms books since the early 2000s. Additionally, Adam provides literary consulting services to fiction authors including action scene choreography, technical vetting and technical editing. In this line of experience, Adam has had the fortune to work with well known authors including Shannon McKenna and Elizabeth Jennings.

Check out Adam’s blog here:

Similar Posts:

Share Button

Craft of Writing


7 Responses to “The Myth of the Ladies’ Gun by Adam Firestone”

  1. Morning Adam!

    Fascinating piece….I will becoming a gun owner this year and taking a firearm safety class specifically geared for women as well. My gun of choice is a Glock – not pink! – but I’m worried about the kickback/recoil on it. I haven’t shot it yet…lol…I’m still in the admiring stage.

    What advice do you have for a woman/heroine in holding the gun? With the blowback/recoil issue should my heroine be holding a gun with both hands?

    And – just because I’ve always wondered – I remember seeing several women wearing a very small gun on a chain around their neck…they said it was really a working gun…but wouldn’t it be more of a pea shooter really at that size?

    As always thanks for posting with us Adam, your posts are always thought provokers!


    Posted by Carrie Spencer | December 30, 2013, 8:53 am
  2. I enjoyed this post. I’m a woman, and every time I shop for a gun or accessories, I’m always shown the same little pink and purple pistols even though that’s not what I’m interested in. People just assume that’s what I want. Recently I was purchasing a hunting rifle and someone (a man) even felt compelled to point out a purple hand gun to me then. As if, in a situation where I needed to use a firearm to protect myself, I’d really be worried about what color it was! I feel like the garish colors suggest that the gun will be used as some sort of novelty or fashion accessory instead of an actual weapon.

    Posted by Ranae Rose | December 30, 2013, 10:19 am
  3. Ranae – Even worse, in my opinion, if a kid came across a pink gun they might think it was a toy.

    Thanks for another great post, Adam – I’m always excited to see what you’ll come up with next.

    If a woman is buying a gun for protection, I would think intimidation would be a factor. What criminal would take a Barbie-pink gun seriously, even if it is a Glock or a PPK?

    On a hunch, I Googled “Glock with bling” – the first one I spotted was a belt buckle that I don’t THINK is a real weapon, but at “The Official GLOCK Picture Thread” there is a gold Glock and a blingy silver Glock. What next??

    Posted by Becke Martin Davis | December 30, 2013, 10:59 am
  4. Thank you for a very thoughtful and thought-provoking article.

    I’ve been shooting for years and started with a .38 Special revolver. Affordable, hardy and reliable, but yeah, kind of wimpy on the stopping power. My heroine uses the same gun I carried as a personal defense weapon for years: an HK P7 in 9mm. With the gas retarded system it has less issue with recoil and target re-acquire, but it still has some and it can be picky about ammo as well as being a best to clean, but a dirty P7 is an unreliable and twitchy pain in the ass.

    Recently I’ve switched my own carry to a 1911-pattern in .45 ACP. I really like the gun, personally–the weight is sufficient to dampen a lot of the recoil and so long as my arms aren’t flabby as hell from too many hours at the keyboard instead of in the gym, it’s not hard to control. the grips are slim and comfortable and there are a million accessories, holsters, and options for this gun. It does weigh down my jackets and purses though.

    In future, I think my heroines may start carrying something a little heftier….

    Posted by Kat Richardson | December 30, 2013, 5:22 pm
  5. Happy New Year, Adam! I hope 2014 is good to you!

    Posted by Becke Martin Davis | December 30, 2013, 11:39 pm
  6. Thanks for the article, Adam. As others have said here, I personally have a problem making a deadly weapon “cute” or “pretty,” but my question stems from arthritis and wrist damage. I can’t handle weight or recoil well any more, so someone suggested a Kimber Pro-Carry. Is there still a gun that is comfortable to fire but packs a punch?

    Posted by Robyn LaRue | December 31, 2013, 6:05 pm
  7. I’d avoid a pink gun (or a pink anything, for that matter), but the first thing that I have to deal with is the grip.

    My son was insistent that I could shoot anything. And he’s right. In theory. I can pull a trigger on anything.

    But my hand is a full inch shorter than his. I cannot fit the grip into the web of my thumb and reach the trigger on many guns. In order to pull the trigger, I’ve got to place the grip on my thumb. Yeah. recoil’s a lot of fun with that position.

    So, yes. Some women do need a shorter reach for the trigger.

    And there are a thousand ‘manly’ guns that work just fine for that purpose. (Most of the traditional “backup” weapons work well.)

    Posted by Shay | January 7, 2014, 8:39 pm

Post a comment

Upcoming Posts

  • Feb 26, 2018 Hook, Line, and Thinker
  • Feb 28, 2018 Kindle Worlds, Asked and Answered
  • Mar 2, 2018 One Series and a Multitude of Lessons





Follow Us